UI/UX Redesign for reducing user’s stress Level 🫀

 

Background

Covid-19 makes a list of needs, especially in digital world. Nowadays, the healthcare industry grows insanely: by the end of 2021 we have more than 350,000 digital health apps available in app stores for smartphone devices.

Imagine a mobile App that prevents the user from discovering diseases too late, and lets him buy insurance that covers personalized care due to any condition. In other words, based on the data you intake to the algorithm, the app tells you the degree of risk of getting a particular disease.

Scary. But the idea is brilliant because at the end of the day, after discovering your highest chances of getting sick, you can easily select and buy insurance personalized for your case.


 

The Task

As a designer, I was asked to help with rethinking the user interface' of 2 screens for such Application, but without changing a functionality a lot. This usually means that UI elements could be essentially modified, but no significant difference in user behavior is required. However, I decided to suggest some of them. And since the project is a conceptual design, unleashing creativity seemed a lovely way to work. 🤓


 

Risks, Strategy and Values

The Risk

The most expensive and fragile that human has is health. When it comes to product design, it’s closely intertwined with time and money. User Experience [in this case] is happened to be precisely in the middle of these 3 factors.

The Strategy

In such an essential decision as possible health conditions, it’s crucial to use all the possible tools to calm down the user. So I established the list of rules and followed them through the whole design concept:

1. Be friendly and informative, but not overwhelming

2. Speak simple language, but maintain the borderline of seriousness

3. Explain with graphics as much as possible, but keep the medical orientation

The Value

Respectful UX is something that we desire both as users and designers. So personalized approach plays a leading role in healthcare products in general, its voice and tone, colors, and design elements.


 

Analysis

Redesigning for just beauty’s sake is not making the product better, but redrawing. However, pretty easy to mess things up when it comes to the pleasure of drawing pixels. I have a checklist for design evaluation to level up the UI but maintain the overall UX simultaneously.

 

Design Evaluation Checklist:

Consistency: Overall look & feel

Hierarchy: General purpose of the screen and clear CTA(s)

Legibility: Texts are legible and readable

Accessibility: Contrast is high enough

Color palette: Proper usage and relevance

Attitude: Voice & tone

 

This list helped me easily detect the problems of the given screens. (Zoom in the embedded file or go ahead and read the results in the article)

Defined Problems with Current UI:

🔺 Consistency

  • Different CTAs styles

  • Second screen is missing the title

🔺 Hierarchy

  • Conflict between the title and subtitle (My plan VS. Recommendations)

  • Icons are not enough for describing an important procedure details

🔺 Legibility

  • Page description’s kerning worsens readability

🔺 Accessibility

  • Boarder line of finger-friendliness (cards and some other clickable elements)

  • the smallest font on card description on the screen is not legible enough

🔺 Color palette

  • Depressing, settled colors

  • icon disharmony

🔺 Attitude

  • ‘Don’t worry’ message is much more important, should be highlighted as a disclaimer or similar

  • Profile picture on the right top corner is nice, but the page could be more personalized visually

  • Each card contains number next to the arrow, and it’s not clear enough what the number means

  • CTA ‘Take the first step’ in the end of the page is not self-explanatory, doesn’t show the user where he gets after clicking it.

  • High risk chance should be more highlighted

Additional notes

  • Consider showing the risk scale before
    the list with numbers, so the user would identify it by the color as well

  • The whole UI is made for iOS. Not sure which platform the app is made for, but by default I would create for both platforms (at least for the concept)


Design Process and the Final Result

Bright colors, minimalistic look, balanced iconography, clear appearance, and a lot of white space are applied for better information scanning. I used the Atomic Design approach to structure elements and kept the new UI design consistent and pleasant to the user’s eye.

New Structure: Organisms example tile

Things Added and Edited

  • Personalization: welcome message, card view with clear CTA, ‘Don’t worry’ message highlighted and placed after the relevant information

  • Improved readability and legibility of all text blocks

  • Color palette: brighter colors, color indications for the risk levels (rainbow-based model where the red is the highest risk chance)

  • New medical icon set for visual information about each disease

  • Removed unnecessary elements like dividers and borders, used white space and grouping instead

  • Rounded corners, friendly icons and language makes the UI much less scary and dangerous

  • Added graph for the visual representation of the risk changes and the level of need of the procedure


Takeaways

The design process can be continuous, even never-ending. What matters the most is the priority of user needs, the deadline, and the business aspect of the product. This process shows that even in a couple of days, the critical design issues can be solved quickly. And if the chosen approach is a good fit for the specific project, the successful result will be even scalable enough to develop the solution in the nearest sprint.

Thank you for reading this through. Feel free to request a design mentorship session with me on ADPlist, and explore more of my working process and stay in touch on social media platforms like LinkedIn, Instagram.

Previous
Previous

Cognitive load minimization along a user journey 🧘‍♀️

Next
Next

Custom illustrations for coffee shop mobile app ✍️